<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Open Fidelity &#187; society</title>
	<atom:link href="http://openfidelity.info/tag/society/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://openfidelity.info</link>
	<description>Faithfulness with or without monogamy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:15:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Steering the polyamory bandwagon</title>
		<link>http://openfidelity.info/2008/03/07/steering-the-polyamory-bandwagon/</link>
		<comments>http://openfidelity.info/2008/03/07/steering-the-polyamory-bandwagon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 12:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AnnaS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polyamory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terminology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openfidelity.info/2008/03/07/steering-the-polyamory-bandwagon/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may have seen the link from here to Alan&#8217;s excellent Polyamory in the News blog. Last week Alan commented on a very interesting article in Wired by Regina Lynn, Internet Pushes Polyamory to Its &#8216;Tipping Point&#8217;. The Wired article suggested that the term polyamory has swept to mainstream acceptance. Alan makes an important point [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have seen the link from here to Alan&#8217;s excellent <a href="http://http://polyinthemedia.blogspot.com/" title="Polyamory in the News" target="_blank">Polyamory in the News</a> blog. Last week Alan <a href="http://polyinthemedia.blogspot.com/2008/02/internet-pushes-polyamory-to-its.html" title="Alan's post" target="_blank">commented </a>on a very interesting article in <a href="http://www.wired.com/" title="Wired" target="_blank">Wired</a> by Regina Lynn, <a href="http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/commentary/sexdrive/2008/02/sexdrive_0229" title="Wired Sex Drive commentary " target="_blank">Internet Pushes Polyamory to Its &#8216;Tipping Point&#8217;</a>. The Wired article suggested that the term polyamory has swept to mainstream acceptance. Alan makes an important point following on from this:</p>
<blockquote><p>People who push hard for years to get a bandwagon rolling are usually unprepared for what to do when the bandwagon finally starts to move&#8230; Unless the people with the original vision stop just shoving the rear bumper and run up and grab the steering wheel, pretty soon the bandwagon outruns them and leaves them behind. And their elation turns to horror as it starts careening downhill unguided, in disastrous unintended directions. And then wrecks itself spectacularly in a ditch&#8230;</p>
<p>So maybe it&#8217;s time for we poly activists to pay less attention to pushing the polyamory-awareness movement, and more to steering it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Alan says we should be taking  every opportunity to save the word polyamory from being cheapened, and should in particular:</p>
<blockquote><p>Insist on the part of the definition that stresses respect and the &#8220;full knowledge and consent of all involved&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>This is well said and timely. I have visions of, say, a woman on  a reality TV show boasting that she are &#8216;polyamorous&#8217; because she has had sex with several men recently, conveniently forgetting about the need to tell each man about the others. And the same woman would no doubt be be horrified if one of these men told her he has another partner. Save us from polyamory becoming a cool word!</p>
<p>But I have a feeling that this is inevitable and that the word will be misused. Alan has in fact posted some <a href="http://polyinthemedia.blogspot.com/2007/08/shifting-meaning-of-word-polyamory.html" title="Shifting meaning of the word polyamory" target="_blank">examples of its misuse</a> last year. Yes, we poly activists should keep insisting that it is used correctly, but as an editor I know you can&#8217;t control how a word evolves, even when thousands of pedants are devoted to keeping the original meaning.</p>
<h3>Where Open Fidelity comes in</h3>
<p>Am I helping or hindering this process with my new term open fidelity?</p>
<p>On the minus side, a few people have accused me of muddying the waters by using a new term when polyamory would do just as well for most of what I am saying.</p>
<p>On the plus side, the term open fidelity is more easily grasped on first hearing and doesn&#8217;t need explanation, whereas polyamory usually needs a definition before the penny drops. And I feel that as the various types of ethical non-monogamous relationships become more widely discussed, it is useful to make distinctions (see my <a href="http://openfidelity.info/2008/01/13/polyamory/" title="Polyamory (and Open Fidelity)" target="_blank">previous post</a> on the different definitions for more on this).</p>
<p>It is precisely because I don&#8217;t want to dilute the definition of polyamory that I have chosen a new term to describe something related &#8211; but not identical &#8211; to it.</p>
<p>The important thing is that, like many others, I am doing my bit to tell the world that being monogamous isn&#8217;t the only way to be faithful, and that honest open relationships and multiple loving relationships are possible. The more of us that do that, whatever terminology we use, the better.</p>
<p>What do you think? Which term do you use for your own relationship(s), and do you think having both terms is useful? And what can we do to keep the meanings of both terms clear?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://openfidelity.info/2008/03/07/steering-the-polyamory-bandwagon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cheating</title>
		<link>http://openfidelity.info/2008/01/20/cheating/</link>
		<comments>http://openfidelity.info/2008/01/20/cheating/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AnnaS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Introduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breaking up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commitment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monogamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[struggles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openfidelity.info/2008/01/20/cheating/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If someone is in a monogamous relationship and is attracted to someone who isn&#8217;t their partner, conventionally they have the following options: ignore the feeling and stay monogamous; leave their partner in order to get together with a new partner; or cheat on their partner with the other person. I&#8217;ve talked a bit about staying [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If someone is in a monogamous relationship and is attracted to someone who isn&#8217;t their partner, conventionally they have the following options:</p>
<ul>
<li>ignore the feeling and stay monogamous;</li>
<li>leave their partner in order to get together with a new partner; or</li>
<li>cheat on their partner with the other person.</li>
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;ve talked a bit about staying monogamous, though I&#8217;m sure there will be more on that in future posts. Leaving the original partner is always a possibility, but often the person does not want to leave, for reasons such as:</p>
<ul>
<li>they love their partner</li>
<li>they feel committed</li>
<li>they don&#8217;t want to be seen to break their promises</li>
<li>breaking up would cause upheaval (emotionally, practically and/or financially, particularly if they are married  or have children).</li>
</ul>
<p>For those who don&#8217;t want to leave their partner but are finding it hard to reconcile this with an attraction to someone else, a secret affair is the only other obvious option in our culture.</p>
<p>So given that other options aren&#8217;t obviously available to most people (a situation I aim to change), it isn&#8217;t really surprising how many people cheat on their partners. It seems to be almost expected by western society today that many people will enter into &#8216;monogamous&#8217; relationships (such as marriage) and will then, sooner or later, have sex with someone else without telling their partner or spouse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://openfidelity.info/2008/01/20/cheating/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

